Atlas Copco, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion
SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON REHEARING
2Per curiam
Petitioners in this case have sought judicial examination of regulations promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) pursuant to the Noise Control Act of 1972.1 Much as in a companion case, Chrysler Corp. v. EPA,2 we earlier found that we lack jurisdiction to review the rules here challenged because they were not issued under authority of Section 6 of the Act.3 Petitioners subsequently requested rehearing on four points, claiming that we did not reach them in our prior opinion. Despite our conviction that we had, and our belief that we were right…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Food Town Stores, Inc., and Lowe's Food Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Atlas Copco, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Chrysler Corp. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Atlas Copco, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979