Legal Opinion

Merrill v. Utah Labor Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 2009No. 20070584PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Petition for Rehearing *

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

T1 Respondent, Wausau Business Insurance, petitioned for rehearing regarding the retroactive application of our ruling in Merrill v. Utah Labor Commission, 2009 UT 26, 223 P.3d 1089. In Merrill, we held that the offset of Utah Code section 34A-2-418(5) was a constitutional violation. Id. T1. Respondent contends that we should, in our equitable discretion, limit the retroactive operation of our ruling.

BACKGROUND

12 Because a complete recitation of the facts is found in Merrill v. Utah Labor Commission, we list only those facts…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Malan v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Rio Algom Corp. v. San Juan CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Nebeker v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. ABCO Enterprises v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Collins v. Sandy City Board of AdjustmentUtah Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Carter v. Lehi CityUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Monarrez v. Utah Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  3. DIRECTV v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. In re Estate of HeaterUtah Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Riggs v. Asbestos Corporation LimitedCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API