Legal Opinion

Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 21, 1999No. G019626PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SILLS, P. J.

The central question in this case is whether an insurer can, in effect, press-gang a policyholder’s personal injury attorney into service as a collection agent when the policyholder receives medical payments from the insurer and then later recovers from a third party tortfeasor. As one might guess from the verb “press-gang,” the answer is no. The theory put forward by the insurer here amounts to a genteel form of involuntary service as a money collector. A few basics need to be kept in mind: An insurer does not detrimentally rely on anything when it makes first party…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Farmers Ins. Exchange v. ZerinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Weiss v. MarcusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Kennedy v. WollenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. General Exchange Insurance v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Coe v. WareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Progressive West Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Shopoff & Cavallo LLP v. HyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. In Re James H. Emery in Re Cheryl A. Emery, Debtors, Kasdan, Simonds, McIntyre Epstein & Martin v. World Savings & Loan Association, in Re James H. Emery in Re Cheryl A. Emery, Debtors, Kasdan, Simonds, McIntyre Epstein & Martin v. World Savings & Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Kenneally v. Bank of Nova ScotiaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010
  5. Florey Institute of Neuroscience & Mental Health v. Kleiner Perkins Caufield & ByersDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API