Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SILLS, P. J.
The central question in this case is whether an insurer can, in effect, press-gang a policyholder’s personal injury attorney into service as a collection agent when the policyholder receives medical payments from the insurer and then later recovers from a third party tortfeasor. As one might guess from the verb “press-gang,” the answer is no. The theory put forward by the insurer here amounts to a genteel form of involuntary service as a money collector. A few basics need to be kept in mind: An insurer does not detrimentally rely on anything when it makes first party…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Farmers Ins. Exchange v. ZerinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Weiss v. MarcusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Kennedy v. WollenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- General Exchange Insurance v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Coe v. WareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Progressive West Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Shopoff & Cavallo LLP v. HyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- In Re James H. Emery in Re Cheryl A. Emery, Debtors, Kasdan, Simonds, McIntyre Epstein & Martin v. World Savings & Loan Association, in Re James H. Emery in Re Cheryl A. Emery, Debtors, Kasdan, Simonds, McIntyre Epstein & Martin v. World Savings & Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Kenneally v. Bank of Nova ScotiaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience & Mental Health v. Kleiner Perkins Caufield & ByersDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.