Legal Opinion
Coe v. Ware
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 6, 1930PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.
The plaintiff sues for false representations alleged to have been made by the defendant, a sales agent of the Pierce-Arrow Sales Corporation, in negotiations ending in his purchase of an automobile from, the corporation. He testified that something was said about a merger of the Pierce-Arrow Corporation with the Studebaker company and he asked whether, if the merger took place, it would have any effect on price; that the defendant said it would not, a taking over by the Studebaker company might affect the price of a larger model but “it will not change the price of this particular model,” he…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Osborne v. MorganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Spooner v. HolmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Dawe v. MorrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Proctor v. DillonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Andrews v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Bond Leather Co., Inc. v. Q.T. Shoe Mfg. Co., Inc. And Martin S. Nadler, Bond Leather Co., Inc. v. Q.T. Shoe Mfg. Co., Inc., Melvin Nadler, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Roy R. Damon and Eleanor M. Damon v. Sun Company, Inc., Roy R. Damon and Eleanor M. Damon v. Sun Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Yerid v. MasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
- General Exchange Insurance v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Refrigeration Discount Corp. v. CatinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.