Florey Institute of Neuroscience & Mental Health v. Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS
SAMUEL CONTI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
Now before the Court is the above-captioned Defendants’ motions to dismiss Plaintiff the Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health’s (“Plaintiff’) first amended complaint. ECF No. 43 (“FAC”). All Defendants except Thomas G. Wiggans join in one motion to dismiss, ECF No. 53 (“KPCB MTD”), while Mr. Wiggans filed his own motion, ECF No. 77 (‘Wiggans MTD”).1 The motions are fully *1038briefed.2 The Court finds the matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-l(b). As discussed…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jackson v. Fandom, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Saffron Rewards, Inc. v. RossieDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022