Legal Opinion

Turney v. Avery

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 9, 1921PublishedCited by 13 opinions

On petition for annulment of marriage. On final hearing ex parte.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Chancellor.

The petition is one for annulment of marriage on two grounds — (1) impotence, and (2) fraud in the contract. The impotence charge is that the defendant had had a surgical operation performed upon, her whereby her ovaries had been removed. The sterility resulting from this the petitioner called impotence, but in law it is not. The doctors who were called testified that the defendant was capable of having sexual intercourse, and the husband testified that he had had such intercourse with her on several occasions. In Kirschbaum v. Kirschbaum, 111 Atl. Rep. 697, I decided that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kirschbaum v. KirschbaumNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Hanrahan's WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  2. Wilson v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Pisciotta v. BuccinoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  4. Costello v. PorzeltNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  5. Vileta v. ViletaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API