Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Wilson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1936No. Appeal, 395PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The libellant alleged in his libel as ground for a divorce that the respondent “was at the time of her marriage, and still is, impotent or incapable of procreation, said condition being permanent and incurable.” To this the wife replied: “Respondent neither admits nor denies the averments in paragraph four and asks due proof thereof at the trial of the cause.” The proofs showed sterility by reason of an operation but not impotence. The master to whom the case was referred recommended an absolute divorce but the court of common pleas refused a decree and dismissed the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. March v. Philadelphia & West Chester Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Rolland & Johnston v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
  3. Gyger's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  4. Foster v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
  5. Griffeth v. GriffethIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Buradus v. General Cement Products Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Commonwealth v. Hubbs (No. 1)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Tannehill v. TannehillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Shaheen v. Knight, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County1957
  5. Manbeck v. ManbeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API