Legal Opinion

Small v. Sandall

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1895No. 5887PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from the district court of York county. Tried below before Wheeler, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, C. J.

The defendant in error, C. M. Sandall, brought this action before a justice of the peace against Mary A. Small, one of the plaintiffs in error, to recover $5 on an account alleged to have been assigned to plaintiff by one Eroid. The bill of particulars was in the usual form, and defendant answered by a general denial. The plaintiff having recovered a judgment for the full amount of his claim, the defendant prosecuted an appeal to the district court, where judgment was again rendered against her and one J. M. Bell, the other plaintiff in error, who was the surety on the appeal undertaking, for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gordon v. LittleNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. RegierNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Fuller v. Brownell & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Harold v. Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Shabata v. JohnstonNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Levy v. South Omaha Savings BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API