Legal Opinion

Levy v. South Omaha Savings Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1899No. 8606PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Dueeie, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, C. J.

In an action for the foreclosure of a real estate mortgage a decree was rendered for the plaintiff, and the defendants have presented the cause to this court for review,. In the district court they© were answers tor but *313two of the now plaintiffs in error, and as to the one for whom there was no answer the decree must be taken as confessed and entirely proper. One of the motions for a new trial was jointly for the non-answering party and one of the others, and the petition in error is jointly by all three plaintiffs in error. One of the parties had not answered, had raised no issues, and could…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gordon v. LittleNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Omaha Fair & Exposition Ass'n v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Small v. SandallNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Harold v. Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Shabata v. JohnstonNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Merchants BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Burgedorff v. HamerNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  3. American Bank v. HandNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API