Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Brownell & Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1896No. 6488PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Keysor, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNoryal, J.

This was an action of replevin by Brownell & Co. against John A. Fuller and Daniel W. Smith to obtain possession of a portable engine and boiler and the appliances connected therewith. The jury, under the direction of the trial judge, returned a verdict finding that the plaintiff, at the commencement of the action, had the right of possession in the property and a special interest *146therein for the sum of $899.47, and assessing the damages for the unlawful detention at fifty cents against each defendant. From a judgment rendered on the verdict a joint petition in error is prosecuted by the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Long v. ClappNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Boldt v. BudwigNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Scott v. ChopeNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Friedlander v. RyderNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Gordon v. LittleNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Frost v. SchinkelNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Ayre v. HixsonOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Couch v. Scandinavian-American BankOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Bush v. HavirdIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Creighton v. KeithNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API