Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. Regier
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error, from the "district court of York county. Tried below before Wheeler, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Irvine, C.
This was an action for malicious prosecution brought by Eegier against the Minneapolis Threshing Machine Company and Newton F. Spear. The theory of the case was that Spear instituted the prosecution in the course of his employment as agent for the Threshing Machine Company. The plaintiff recovered judgment against both defendants for $250.
Some of the assignments of error and many of the arguments advanced in the briefs are in their nature applicable to the case of only one of the defendants. The defendants below joined in the motion for a new trial and they have proceeded in this…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dennis v. . RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Marshall v. BetnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
- Stone v. StevensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837
- Ewing v. SanfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
- Shaul v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kuhnhausen v. StadelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Nelson v. KelloggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Grimes v. GreenblattSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Mertens v. MuellerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Baer v. ChambersWashington Supreme Court · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.