Legal Opinion
Arizona-Parral Mining Co. v. Forbes
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided February 20, 1915No. Civil No. 1419PublishedCited by 26 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Pima. A. C. Lockwood, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.
The appellee, plaintiff below, instituted this action against the appellant, the defendant below, on November 7, 1912, for his services as a broker or middleman under a contract dated November 16, 1910. The contract, which is in the form of a letter from appellant to appellee, was set out in the complaint, and is in words and figures as follows:
“Arizona-Parral Mining Company,
“1012 Baltimore Avenue.
“Kansas City, Mo., November 16, 1910.
“Mr. A. W. Forbes, P. 0. Box No. 868, Tucson, Arizona—■ Dear sir: I have your letter of November 11th, and in reply beg to say that this company cannot consider…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Dodge v. GaylordIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Lillie v. TrentmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Faw v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- Housekeeper Pub. Co. v. SwiftCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Ohio Valley Trust Co. v. WernkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- United States v. Brookridge Farm, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Brady v. Black Mountain Investment Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Hurst v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Hurst v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.