Legal Opinion

Yeo v. State Farm Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1996No. Docket 183065PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

Defendant appeals as of right the trial court’s grant of summary disposition, dismissing without prejudice plaintiffs claim for benefits under a homeowner’s policy. Defendant argues that the dismissal should have been with prejudice. We disagree and affirm the ruling of the trial court.

Plaintiff owned a home that was insured by defendant. Plaintiff alleged that on July 22, 1994, her home was burglarized and property was stolen therefrom. Plaintiff sought to collect benefits under her homeowner’s policy. In a September 27, 1994, letter, defendant requested, pursuant to the homeowner’s policy,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reed v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Gibson v. Group InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Gordon v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Knox v. KnoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Thomson v. State Farm InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Yeo v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Ins. Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Cruz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Hanover Insurance v. Cape Cod Custom Home Theater Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  5. Wineholt v. Cincinnati InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API