Legal Opinion

Gordon v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1917No. Docket No. 136PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Error to Allegan; Cross, J. Assumpsit by Catherine Gordon against the'St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company on a policy of insurance. Judgment for plaintiff on a directed verdict. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

On June 7, 1913, defendant issued to plaintiff a Michigan standard form insurance policy for $1,200 on a dwelling house and $100 on a woodshed located a short distance from Saugatuck and beyond fire protection of that village. While a new policy was issued, it was a renewal with a small increase of the amount then carried. The policy was for three years, and took effect June 20th. The property was worth from $2,700 to $3,200. The agent of defendant solicited the insurance, and suggested that plaintiff take out insurance in a larger amount than she did, but she declined. The agent inquired if…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Short v. . Home Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Aurora Fire & Marine Insurance v. KranichMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Cross v. National Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Rochester Loan & Banking Co. v. Liberty InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Bennett v. . Agr'l Ins. Co. of WatertownNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Cruz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hickman v. London Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Roberts v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. Crossman v. American InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Gibson v. Group InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API