Legal Opinion
Mandy R. Ex Rel. Mr. & Mrs. R. v. Owens
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 21, 2006No. 05-1148, 05-1150PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.
Colorado has a waiting list of hundreds of developmentally disabled persons who need but do not receive Medicaid-funded services. Six such persons and an association of providers brought this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that the State of Colorado has failed to comply with three requirements of the Medicaid Act, namely reasonable promptness, comparability, and sufficient payments. After a bench trial, the district court entered judgment for the Defendants. We hold that the reasonable promptness and comparability requirements do not require the State to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Blessing v. FreestoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Burks v. LaskerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Doe v. ChilesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Ball v. RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Ton Services, Inc. v. Qwest Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Morris v. Oklahoma Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Oklahoma Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics v. FogartyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Hawkins v. COUNTY OF BENT, COLO.District Court, D. Colorado · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.