Legal Opinion
Doe v. Chiles
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided February 26, 1998No. 96-5144PublishedCited by 110 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Chief Judge:
In this action based on 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the district court found that officials of the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services were failing to furnish Medicaid assistance with “reasonable promptness” to eligible developmentally disabled individuals, and thus were violating a provision of the Medicaid Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1396(a)(8).1 Thereafter, the court enjoined the officials from failing to provide the assistance within a “reasonable” time period, not to exceed ninety days. The officials appeal, and, for the reasons stated herein, we affirm the judgment…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Planned Parenthood of Indiana, Inc. v. Commissioner of Indiana State Department of HealthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- J.B. Ex Rel. Hart v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Gean v. HattawayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Derek Waskul v. Washtenaw Cnty. Community Mental HealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Brian Bruggeman by and Through His Parents, Kenneth and Carol Bruggeman v. Rod BlagojevichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.