Legal Opinion
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 13, 1993No. 88 CIV. 4486 (DNE)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement in the action commenced by the plaintiff United States of America (the “Government”) against the defendants International Brotherhood of Teamsters (the “IBT”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board (the “GEB”) embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14, 1989 (the “Consent Decree”). The Consent Decree provides for three Court-appointed officials: the Independent Administrator to oversee the Consent Decree’s remedial provisions, the Investigations Officer to bring charges against corrupt…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- United States v. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & HelpersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- STEVEN SHADLE v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION, et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995