Legal Opinion
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 30, 1993No. 88 Civ. 4486 (DNE)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement of an action commenced by plaintiff United States of America (the “Government”) against defendants International Brotherhood of Teamsters (the “IBT” or the “Union”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board (the “GEB”) embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14, 1989 (the “Consent Decree”). The Consent Decree provides for three Court-appointed officials: the Independent Administrator to oversee the Consent Decree’s remedial provisions, the Investigations Officer to bring charges against…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rendell-Baker v. KohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. BurhoeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- United States v. International Brotherhood Of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.