Legal Opinion

Hamon v. Digliani

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 3, 1961PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMubphy, J.

The named plaintiff, alleging that she was severely burned and otherwise injured when the contents of a bottle of Lestoil, a household detergent, spilled on her, brought suit against the named defendant, a retail storekeeper from whom she had purchased it, and against Lestoil Corporation and the Adell Chemical Company, the manufacturers of the product, hereinafter referred to as the defendants, to recover damages for the injuries allegedly sustained. In the second count of her complaint, she alleged that the defendants had extensively promoted Lestoil by radio, television, newspaper and other…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Jacob E. Decker & Sons, Inc. v. CappsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Borucki v. MacKenzie Brothers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  4. Gearing v. BerksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Worley v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Randy Knitwear, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Lydia Basko v. Sterling Drug, Inc., and Winthrop LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  5. Salvador v. Atlantic Steel Boiler Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API