Legal Opinion

Eastman Chemical Company v. PlastiPure, Incorporat

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 22, 2014No. 13-51087PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JENNIFER WALKER ELROD, Circuit Judge:

After a jury found that PlastiPure, Inc. and CertiChem, Inc. violated the Lanham Act by making false statements of fact about their competitor’s product, the district court entered an injunction against both companies. On appeal, PlastiPure and CertiChem challenge the jury verdict and the injunction on various grounds, including that their statements constituted non-actionable scientific opinions rather than actionable statements of fact. Because the Lanham Act prohibits false commercial speech even when that speech makes scientific claims, and because…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Clorox Co. Puerto Rico v. Proctor & Gamble Commercial Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. McCaig Ex Rel. Estate of McCaig v. Wells Fargo Bank (Texas), N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  2. ADT, LLC v. Capital Connect, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2015
  3. SED Holdings v. TM Prop SolutionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  4. Young v. Bd. of Supervisors of Humphreys Cnty.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  5. FedEx Ground Package Sys, Inc. v. Route Consultant, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API