ADT, LLC v. Capital Connect, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
A. JOE FISH, Senior United States District Judge
Before the court is the motion of the plaintiffs, ADT LLC and ADT U.S. Holdings, Inc. (together “ADT”), for a preliminary injunction. For the reasons stated below, the plaintiffs’ motion is granted.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
ADT provides electronic security services and equipment to homes and businesses throughout the. United States. ADT’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (“Motion”) at 3 (docket entry 4). ADT has been providing alarm services for over a century and today provides monitoring services for nearly…
2Cases cited127 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- AMID, Inc. v. Medic Alert Foundation United States, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
- Springboards to Educ., Inc. v. Kipp Found.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2018
- Board of Regents of the University of Houston System ex rel. University of Houston System v. Houston College of Law, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
- Med-Cert Home Care, LLC v. AzarDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2019
- Helpful Hound, L.L.C. v. New Orleans Bldg. Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2018
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.