Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Gumer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 25, 1983No. Appeal No. 2Published

1Opinion of the Court

) Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Special Term did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ motion for a default judgment even though defendant’s answer was served 17 days late and one day after plaintiffs moved for a default judgment. Within 20 days after the service of the complaint, defendant moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action was barred by the Statute of Limitations. The motion was denied and the defendant was given 10 days after the service of the order to serve his answer. Defendant appealed from the order denying the motion, and in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miskiewicz v. Hartley Restaurant Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Donnelly v. PepicelliNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Hayes v. BurkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. CMI Clothesmakers, Inc. v. KnopfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Donnelly v. PepicelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API