Legal Opinion

Donnelly v. Pepicelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 9, 1982PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed, with costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: Special Term granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the action for failure to serve a complaint unless plaintiff served a complaint within 20 days of its order. In making the order conditional, it abused its discretion (see Saraceno v Piscopo, 16 AD2d 735). Plaintiff’s moving papers contain no competent evidence of merit to the action and his excuse, that discovery was necessary to draft a complaint, is no more than a law office failure under the circumstances presented (see Cohen v First Nat. City Bank, 75 AD2d 837, affd 52 NY2d 863;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caton v. Schenectady GazetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Cohen v. First National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Cohen v. First National City BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Saraceno v. PiscopoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  5. Niesluchowski v. Clute Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. GumerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API