Legal Opinion
Miskiewicz v. Hartley Restaurant Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 23, 1983PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*965OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, the case remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for further proceedings with respect to the individual respondents, and the order of Supreme Court, Nassau County, insofar as it denied the motions to dismiss the complaint as to respondent Village of Valley Stream reinstated.
Defendants moved pursuant to CPLR 3216 to dismiss the action because of plaintiffs’ failure to file a note of issue. Special Term denied the motion. The Appellate Division, relying on Barasch v Micucci (49 NY2d…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Barasch v. MicucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by18 opinions
- Salch v. ParatoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Pastore v. Golub Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Chase v. ScaliciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Donnelly v. PepicelliNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Goussous v. Modern Food Market, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.