Legal Opinion

Donnelly v. Pepicelli

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1983PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

A failure timely to serve a complaint as a result of a disagreement between the opposing attorneys with respect to discovery is not law office failure. That being so and there being a sufficient indication of merit and no indication of prejudice to defendant in the motion papers, it was not an abuse of discretion as a matter of law for Special Term to condition dismissal of the action upon plaintiff’s service of a complaint within 20 days. The case is, therefore, remitted to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, for its reconsideration of the matter and exercise of…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Miskiewicz v. Hartley Restaurant Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. Goussous v. Modern Food Market, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Heusinger v. RussoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Siracusa v. Teal's Express, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Boss v. Avoxe Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Bates Real Estate, Inc. v. Marquette Land Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API