Donnelly v. Pepicelli
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
A failure timely to serve a complaint as a result of a disagreement between the opposing attorneys with respect to discovery is not law office failure. That being so and there being a sufficient indication of merit and no indication of prejudice to defendant in the motion papers, it was not an abuse of discretion as a matter of law for Special Term to condition dismissal of the action upon plaintiff’s service of a complaint within 20 days. The case is, therefore, remitted to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, for its reconsideration of the matter and exercise of…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Miskiewicz v. Hartley Restaurant Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
4Cited by11 opinions
- Goussous v. Modern Food Market, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Heusinger v. RussoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Siracusa v. Teal's Express, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Boss v. Avoxe Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Bates Real Estate, Inc. v. Marquette Land Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.