Legal Opinion
Zimmerman v. City of Oakland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 21, 2001No. 99-16828PublishedCited by 184 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Ronald Zimmerman, Steffi Zimmerman, Jim Hines, and the Jim Hines Foundation (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) appeal the dismissal of their complaint against the City of Oakland and various individuals employed by the city (collectively, “Defendants”). We reverse in part, affirm in part, and remand.
I
According to the complaint, the Zimmer-mans own property in Oakland that is zoned for light industrial use. The dispute in this case revolves around a reconditioned transit bus stored on that property for the use of the Jim Hines Foundation, a non-profit organization…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by184 opinions
- Marsh v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Esau Awabdy v. City of Adelanto Scott Burnell Ted Hartz Richard Althouse, Michael Sakamoto, Does I-X, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Jules Brody Joyce T. Crawford v. Transitional Hospitals Corporation Wendy L. Simpson Richard L. ConteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Mary Hendow Julie Albertson v. University of PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Zimmerman v. City Of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.