O'Connell v. Arai
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Y akey, J., entered December 5, 1910, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for unlawful detainer.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
Action for unlawful detainer. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff as prayed for in his complaint, and defendants have appealed.
It appears that on January 1, 1909, the plaintiff leased lot 4, block 32, Maynard’s addition to Seattle, to defendant Arai for a period of three years, at a rental of $785 per month. This property was located within what was known as the Jackson street regrade district, in Seattle, and the written léase provided that the plaintiff should make alterations in the premises so as to conform same to the street regrade when completed. On April 30, 1910, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hart v. PrattWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Hinckley v. CaseyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Lowman v. WestWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Quandt v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by8 opinions
- Armstrong v. BurkettWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hansen & Rowland Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- First National Bank v. White-Dulany Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
- Glover v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Abarca Sanfeliz Vda. de Gumersindo Suárez v. Bank of Nova ScotiaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.