Legal Opinion

State v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 1, 1970No. 41742PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the municipal court denying a motion by defendant, Brenda Edwards, for dismissal and from a judgment whereby she was convicted of violating Minn. St. 169.974, subd. 4(a). The motion to dismiss asserts that the statute “is unconstitutional since it is repugnant to the reserved powers clause of the Ninth Amendment and to the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and to Article I, Section II, the rights and privileges clause and Article I, Section XVI, the reserve powers clause of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Beck v. GroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Bisenius v. KarnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Ex Parte SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. HershbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Costley v. Caromin House, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Robotham Ex Rel. Robotham v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Minn. State Bd. of Health v. City of BrainerdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. People v. KohrigIllinois Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API