Legal Opinion

City of Duluth v. Northland Greyhound Lines

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 28, 1952No. 35,735PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order for judgment after trial by the court without a jury upon stipulated facts.

In 1915, the city of Duluth adopted an ordinance, No. 636, regulating the business of carrying passengers as a common carrier for hire by autocar within the city limits and requiring, among other things, the payment of a license fee for so doing. Section 3 of the ordinance, which is here involved, reads:

“It is hereby declared to be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to carry on the business of operating…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. State Bd. of Tax Commr's of Ind. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Brown-Forman Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Johnson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Midland Glass Company, Inc. v. City of ShakopeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API