Legal Opinion
Gavron v. Blinder Robinson & Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 16, 1987No. Civ. A. No. 86-5006PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KATZ, District Judge.
The named plaintiff in this case, Bradley Gavron, has moved, pursuant to Rules 23(c) and 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that this action be maintained as a Class Action. The class that plaintiff proposes would include “all persons who owned shares of common stock of Stansbury Mining Corporation (“Stansbury”) on June 9, 1986, and who, during the period from June 9,1986, through the present (the “Class Period”), sold shares of Stansbury common stock (the “Class”);” and exclude “defendant Blinder, Robinson & Co., Inc. (“Blinder”), their…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Eisenberg v. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Alexander Kahan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lewis RosenstielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Cammer v. BloomDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Zirn v. VLI Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Gaffin v. Teledyne, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Forman v. Data Transfer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Moskowitz v. LoppDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.