Legal Opinion

Forman v. Data Transfer, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1995No. Civil Action No. 95-3474PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GILES, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, against Data Transfer, under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(C). He alleges that, on repeated occasions, Data Transfer sent unsolicited advertisements by facsimile machine in violation of the statute. Plaintiff moves for class certification. That motion is opposed. For the reasons which follow, the motion is denied.

BACKGROUND

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(C), prohibits any person within the United…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. In Re General Motors Corporation Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation. Jack French, Robert M. West, Charles E. Merritt, Gary Blades, Dawn and Tracey Best, Gary and Jackie Barnes, Betty Marteny, John and Mary Southands, Edmund Berning, Dale W. Plummer, Edmund and Anneta Casey, John and Connie Yonki, Carl and Kathryn Corona, Dallas and Patricia Nelson, Mynard and Mildred Duncan, Kirby L. Stegman, Dewayne Anderson, Morris and Barbara Betzold, in No. 94-1064. Rudolph Jenkins, William D. Cunningham, Mather Johnson, Forrest Charles Ginn, Buren William Jones and Martin D. Parkman, in No. 94-1194. Parish of Jefferson, in No. 94-1195. The State of New York, in No. 94-1198. Elton Wilson, Individually, and Frank I. Owen, Individually and on Behalf of the Residents of the State of Alabama, in No. 94-1202. City of New York, in No. 94-1203. Betty Youngs, Barbara Phillips, Margaret Engel, Larry Swope, Robbin Maxwell and Center for Auto Safety, in No. 94-1207. Betty Youngs, Barbara Phillips, Margaret Engel, Larry Swope, Robbin Maxwell and Center for Auto Safety, in No. 94-1208. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, in No. 94-1219Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 211, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9931 Sandra Wetzel and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Equal Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  5. Baby Neal v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. William Barnes v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  2. Rollins, Inc. v. ButlandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. SheldonTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Intratex Gas Co. v. BeesonTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Shuette v. Beazer Homes Holdings Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API