Legal Opinion
Moskowitz v. Lopp
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 7, 1989No. Civ. A. No. 88-0355PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BECHTLE, District Judge.
Presently before the court are plaintiff’s motions for class certification pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a) and (b)(3) and to compel the production of documents which defendants claim are protected by the attorney-client privilege. For the reasons set forth herein, plaintiff’s motion for class certification will be granted as to counts I and III, *627and denied as to count II. In addition, plaintiffs motion to compel will be denied as to defendant E.F. Hutton Group, Inc., and granted as to defendants Lopp, Rittereiser, Fomon and Pierce insofar as these…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Karcich v. StuartDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Forman v. Data Transfer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- In re Kidder Peabody Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- In Re Sahlen & Associates, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1991
- In re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.