Legal Opinion

Jesselson v. Outlet Associates of Williamsburg, Ltd. Partnership

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided December 16, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-1-NNPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CLARKE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Ludwig Jesselson, Erica Jessel-son and Lucy Lang, Trustees of the Jessel-son 1983 Charitable Trust (“Trust” or “Plaintiffs”), pursuant to Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, object to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that the ruling on Defendants’ Motion in Limine to exclude certain testimony and documents from evidence not be treated as dispositive. For the reasons set out more fully below, Plaintiffs’ Objections to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are OVERRULED, and Plaintiffs’ Motion that…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  4. Paterson-Leitch Company, Inc. v. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  5. James Borden v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee HosieryDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
  2. Tafas v. DudasDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
  3. Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee HosieryDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  4. Contravest Inc. v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
  5. United States Ex Rel. Davis v. PrinceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API