Legal Opinion
Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee Hosiery
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 26, 1997No. 96-1949PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORLOFSKY, District Judge.
This is an appeal from a magistrate judge’s order imposing sanctions for Appellants’ eleventh hour substitution of expert witnesses in a commercial dispute over the distribution and sale of pantyhose manufactured by Appellees in Mexico and shipped to Appellants in Lithuania. This appeal presents a procedural issue which appears to have eluded resolution in the Circuit Courts of Appeals: whether a party’s failure to raise issues before a magistrate judge in the first instance constitutes a waiver of those issues on appeal to the district court from the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Henderson v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Ocelot Oil Corporation v. Sparrow IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Doe v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee HosieryDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee HosieryDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Thomas v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.