United States Ex Rel. Davis v. Prince
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
T.S. ELLIS, III, District Judge.
In this False Claims Act 1 case, the magistrate judge issued a protective order that authorizes any party’s counsel to designate any discovery materials 2 as confidential and then prohibits any party from making any public disclosure of that material. Plaintiffs filed an objection to the protective order, pursuant to Rule 72(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, arguing that the protective order is “clearly erroneous and contrary to law.” For the reasons that follow, the magistrate judge’s order must be vacated.
I
Plaintiffs, Melan and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Michael D. Van Etten v. Bridgestone/Firestone, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Citizens First National Bank of Princeton v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Thomas E. Hoar, Inc. v. Sara Lee Corp., Appeal of Greenspan, Jaffe & Rosenblatt, Leon J. Greenspan, Paul D. Jaffe and Victor E. RosenblattCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Ashcraft v. Conoco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Singletary v. Sterling Transport Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
- United States v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- In re Petroforte Brasileiro de Petroleo Ltda.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2015
- Barnett v. CummingsDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2023
- Black v. CummingsDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2023
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.