Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1979No. 3PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

By his first assignment of error defendant contends the trial court erred in failing to commit defendant for a psychiatric examination prior to holding a hearing to determine defendant’s capacity to proceed as mandated by G.S. 15A-1002. That statute provides in relevant part:

“(a) The question of the capacity of the defendant to proceed may be raised at any time on motion by the prosecutor, the defendant, the defense counsel, or the court. The motion shall detail the specific conduct that leads the moving party to question the defendant’s capacity to proceed.(b) When the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. State v. CherrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. Van McDougallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API