Legal Opinion
Parness v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided August 13, 2003No. 02-80567-CIVPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ZLOCH, Chief Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Defendant, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 13). The Court has carefully reviewed said Motion, the entire court file and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.
I. Background
Plaintiff, Nancy Parness (hereinafter “Parness”), commenced the above-styled cause by filing a Complaint (DE 1, Ex. A) in state court pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (hereinafter “ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., seeking to recover long term disability (hereinafter “LTD”)…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bill Clark Herbert Futch Austin Hurst Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cecilia Nichols v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Docket No. 04-1445-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Anderson v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2006
- Richards v. Hartford Life and Accident Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
- Fick v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
- Featherston v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.