Legal Opinion

Rakness v. Swift & Company

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 30, 1970No. 41634PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court granting defendants judgment notwithstanding a verdict for plaintiff and further providing that, if said order be set aside or vacated, a new trial be granted. The issue presented is whether plaintiff-employee, Harold M. Rakness, who began working for defendant Swift & Company, December 10, 1942, and suffered a permanently disabling heart attack October 18, 1962, but continued in the status of an employee until sometime during 1963 or 1964, had completed 20 years or more of continuous service prior to such disability so as to qualify…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCormack v. Hankscraft CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. Ford v. StevensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. Rakness v. Swift and CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Landro v. Glendenning Motorways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  2. Foss v. MahalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Melin v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Shaw v. Atlantic Coast Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Landro v. Glendenning Motorways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API