Melin v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Justice.
Plaintiff brought suit against his employer, Northwestern Bell Telephone Company, alleging he was entitled to disability benefits for alcoholism under his employer’s pension and disability benefit plan. After a bench trial, the district court entered judgment for defendant, from which this appeal is taken. We affirm".'
The facts are undisputed. Plaintiff was employed by defendant from late 1945 until August 4, 1971, when he was dismissed from his position as an engineer because of alcoholism. Plaintiff was rehired by defendant on March 1,1976. The events relevant to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Joe B. Driver v. Arthur Hinnant, Superintendent Halifax County Prison Unit of the North Carolina State Prison DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- Charlie Craig v. Bemis Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- James Wyper, Jr. v. Providence Washington Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Hays v. FinchDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- Lano v. Rochester Germicide Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Landro v. Glendenning Motorways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Moeller v. Minnesota Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Ford v. American Express Financial Advisors, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
- Landro v. Glendenning Motorways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980