Legal Opinion

City of Grapevine v. Sipes

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2006No. 04-0933PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Jefferson

Under the Texas Tort Claims Act, a governmental unit retains immunity for claims based on the absence of a traffic signal unless the absence is not corrected by the governmental unit within a reasonable time after notice. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 101.060(a)(2). The trial court held that this provision immunized the City of Grapevine from liability based on its alleged negligence in failing to install a traffic signal within a reasonable time after initially deciding to do so. The court of appeals disagreed and reversed in part the trial court’s judgment. Because we conclude that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Criminal Justice v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Lowe v. Texas Tech UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  3. University of Texas Medical Branch v. YorkTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Garrison Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Texas Department of Transportation v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Pakdimounivong v. City of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Texas Department of Transportation v. Olivares, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  3. Schronk v. City of BurlesonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  4. Fort Bend County Toll Road Authority v. Olivares, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  5. City of Dallas v. Saucedo-Falls, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API