City of Grapevine v. Sipes
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Jefferson
Under the Texas Tort Claims Act, a governmental unit retains immunity for claims based on the absence of a traffic signal unless the absence is not corrected by the governmental unit within a reasonable time after notice. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 101.060(a)(2). The trial court held that this provision immunized the City of Grapevine from liability based on its alleged negligence in failing to install a traffic signal within a reasonable time after initially deciding to do so. The court of appeals disagreed and reversed in part the trial court’s judgment. Because we conclude that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Texas Department of Criminal Justice v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Lowe v. Texas Tech UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- University of Texas Medical Branch v. YorkTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Garrison Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Texas Department of Transportation v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Pakdimounivong v. City of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Texas Department of Transportation v. Olivares, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
- Schronk v. City of BurlesonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Fort Bend County Toll Road Authority v. Olivares, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
- City of Dallas v. Saucedo-Falls, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.