Legal Opinion

Chrisman v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 12, 2007No. B184689PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUBIN, J.

Kelly Chrisman appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition for a writ of mandate ordering the Los Angeles Police Department to reinstate him as a police officer. We reverse and remand for further proceedings for the limited purpose of the department’s reconsideration of the proper punishment for appellant’s misconduct.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Appellant Kelly Chrisman was a Los Angeles police officer until the Los Angeles Police Department fired him in October 2003 for misusing his department computer. His troubles began when he started dating a woman named Cynthia…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Perez v. Van Groningen & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Bernard v. FoleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Terry ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Terry ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. hiQ Labs, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
  4. Erhart v. Bofi Holding, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2019
  5. Welenco, Inc. v. CorbellDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API