Legal Opinion
Independent School District No. 5 of Tulsa County v. Spry
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 20, 2012No. Nos. 110694, 110693PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
1 1 The school districts argued that the Act was unconstitutional because it violated several provisions of the Oklahoma Constitution. Oral argument was requested and a multitude of allegedly interested parties filed ami-cus curige briefs,. Because the school districts lack standing/justiciable issues to sue parents of students for the issuance of state *20dollars from the State Department of Education to the parents for payments to private schools, we deny the motion for oral argument and deny all applications for amicus curiae briefs.
T2 Standing has traditionally been defined as whether a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Fent v. Contingency Review BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Democratic Party of Oklahoma v. EstepSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Independent School District No. 9 v. GlassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Underside v. LathropSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- Murray County v. Homesales, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- MURRAY COUNTY v. HOMESALES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.