Legal Opinion
Lima v. Woodruff
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 21, 1930No. Docket No. 7322PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying appellant a peremptory writ of mandate to compel respondent Woodruff, as building inspector of the city of San Jose, to issue a permit for the construction of a combined residence and store building. After appellant and his architect had taken up orally with respondent Wood-ruff the matter of the issuance of such permit, but before any written application had been made therefor, a certain emergency Ordinance No. 2232 was adopted by the city council of San Jose which directed the building inspector not to issue any building permit…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Brougher v. Board of Public Works of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Berrata v. SalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Maguire v. ReardonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by13 opinions
- CEEED v. California Coastal Zone Conservation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Adler v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Metro Realty v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Fletcher v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Wilson v. City of Laguna BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.