Legal Opinion

Sternitzke v. Donahue's Jewelers

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 10, 1957No. 37,020, 37,021, 37,022, 37,023, 37,057, 37,058PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

Evelyn D. Sternitzke commenced an action against Donahue’s Jewelers to recover for personal injuries on the ground of negligence based upon the icy and slippery condition of the sidewalk in front of the store building leased and occupied by Donahue’s Jewelers. Her husband brought a companion suit to recover for loss of services, together with medical and hospital expenses incurred. After answers of defendants were interposed, pretrial depositions of plaintiffs were taken May 11, 1955. The date of the alleged accident was fixed as December 11, 1951. Motion for summary judgment…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Noonan v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. City of Wabasha v. SouthworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Abar v. Ramsey Motor Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. Cooper v. HoeglundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. Isham v. BroderickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Donald v. MosesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Brittain v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. Epps v. RemmelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  4. Pagett v. Northern Electric Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  5. Quigley v. Village of HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API