Legal Opinion

Epps v. Remmel

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 16, 1963No. 5-3139PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sam Robinson, Associate Justice.

Appellant, Edith Epps, filed this personal injury suit in the Pulaski Circuit Court alleging that she received bodily injuries when she stepped in a hole in the sidewalk which adjoins appellee’s property on Main Street in Little Rock. Appellee, Remmel, answered denying the allegations of the complaint. Later, defendant filed a motion for a summary judgment. The trial court granted the motion, rendered a judgment in favor of the defendant, Remmel, and the plaintiff, Epps, has appealed.

One of the grounds for the granting of a summary judgment is that there is no…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schaefer v. LenahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Woods v. City of PalatkaSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Major v. FraserNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  4. United States v. DollarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1951
  5. Vissman v. KobyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Donald v. City National Bank of DothanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Gordon v. MatsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. Jones v. ComerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. Kealy v. Lumbermen's Mutual Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  5. Van Dalsen v. InmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API