Liberty v. State Dept. of Transportation
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
Plaintiffs initiated these consolidated negligence actions against the state for personal injuries that they suffered when they fell from a path that ran from a state highway to a private recreational area open to the public. The trial court granted the state’s summary judgment motion on the ground that the state was entitled to immunity under ORS 105.682, which provides immunity to owners of land opened to the public for recreational purposes. We affirmed. Liberty v. State Dept. of Transportation, 200 Or App 607, 116 P3d 902 (2005). In our opinion, we addressed plaintiffs’ argument that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chamberlain v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Liberty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Liberty v. State, Dept. of Transp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
3Cited by3 opinions
- Liberty v. State, Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Coleman v. Oregon Parks & Recreation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Emily Johnson v. Scott GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015