Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Gibson
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 14, 2013No. Case No. 3:11-CV-432-ACPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1076OPINION AND ORDER
ACOSTA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiff Emily Johnson (“Johnson”) filed this action asserting a single negligence claim against defendants Scott Gibson and Robert Stillson (collectively “Defendants”) for injuries she sustained when she fell while jogging in Tom McCall Waterfront Park (the “Park”). Defendants move for summary judgment and seek substitution of the City of Portland (“City”), owner of the Park and Defendants’ employer, as the sole defendant under Or.Rev.Stat. 30.265. Johnson asks the court to take judicial notice of opinions entered by Judge…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Godofredo Hernandez v. Spacelabs Medical Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. GibsonOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Emily Johnson v. Scott GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Johnson v. GibsonOregon Supreme Court · 2016