Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Arlington Bank & Trust Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided July 24, 1985No. 2-85-016-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HILL, Justice.
Dr. Charles F. Bailey, Jr. appeals from a directed verdict that he take nothing in his suit to set aside or modify a trust agreement and a deed executed in connection with the trust agreement. In a single point of error, Dr. Bailey maintains that he presented sufficient evidence of probative force to present to the jury that the trust and deed should be set aside due to duress or undue influence.
We affirm, because we do not find that there was any evidence of probative force to raise such a fact issue.
In reviewing the granting of an instructed verdict by the trial court,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- White v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Jones v. Tarrant Utility Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
- Texas Employers Insurance Ass'n v. PageTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Dale v. SimonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Ottis v. HaasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Decker v. DeckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Lambert v. Affiliated Foods, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
- State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. ThrasherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- DEPT. OF HWYS. & PUB. TRANSP. v. Thrasher, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1990
- Debra Renae Decker, Individually and Sole Heir and/or Beneficiary Under Last Will and Testament ofJimmy Ray Decker, and/or of the Estate of Jimmy Ray Decker, AND Leroy Decker, Sr. v. Leroy Decker, Sr. AND Debra Renae Decker, Individually and Sole Heir and/or Beneficiary Under Last Will and Testament ofJimmy Ray Decker, and/or of the Estate of Jimmy Ray Decker, and Curtis Cooper, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.