Legal Opinion

State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. Thrasher

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 29, 1990No. 12-89-00008-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAM BASS, Justice.

This is a workers’ compensation case. Based upon a jury verdict, the trial court rendered judgment that the appellee-claim-ant, Larry Thrasher, recover benefits for permanent partial disability. The Highway Department argues that Thrasher’s recovery is barred under Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 8306, § 21 (Vernon 1967), because when he applied for the Highway Department job, he concealed a prior acute back strain. In the State’s view this deception amounts to an intentional and false representation that he had not been afflicted with the occupational disease which is the cause…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Seideneck v. Cal Bayreuther AssociatesTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Bailey v. Arlington Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Freeman v. RothrockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Akef v. BASF Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  3. DEPT. OF HWYS. & PUB. TRANSP. v. Thrasher, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1990
  4. Freeman v. RothrockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API