Dale v. Simon
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.
Defendants in error sued plaintiffs in error to recover back $22,000 alleged to have been paid by defendants in error under duress.
The plaintiffs in error, J. E. Dale, J. T. Dale, and J. B. Dale, now deceased, entered into a lease contract, of date May 29, 1919, with defendants in error, U. M. Simon and Dan Brown, whereby plaintiffs in error granted, demised, released, and let unto the defendants in error, for the purpose of mining and operating for oil and gas 22,000 acres of land with the right of ingress and egress over said premises, for a consideration of $110,000, which was paid. It was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ward v. ScarboroughTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Joannin v. OgilvieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Landa v. ObertTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Ph&338nix Land Co. v. ExallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Guetzkow Bros. v. BreeseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Gooch v. American Sling Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Chapman Children's Trust v. Porter & Hedges, L.L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- State National Bank of El Paso v. Farah Manufacturing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1984
- Likover v. Sunflower Terrace II, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
- Wright v. Sydow, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.